Nyt layout på EkstraBladet.dk – en øjebæ?

Så fik EkstraBladet.dk nyt layout. Det er noget som har været undervejs længe, og enkelte undersider har gennem et stykke tid haft dele af det nye layout indarbejdet. Men det er først nu layoutet er på forsiden. Og hvad skal man så synes om det?

Tja – jeg kan ikke lide det! Så er det sagt. Strukturen på sitet er IMO helt væk. Det samme er den røde tråd – antallet af billeder, billedestørrelser, font-størrelser osv. er uendelig og efterlader en med det indtryk, at man har ramt forsiden af “Kig Ind” mens den er ved at blive færdig layoutet.

eb

Jeg ved ikke om der har siddet en række amerikanske eksperter og rådgivere som har bildt EkstraBladet ind at dette er fremtiden, men jeg har svært ved at fornuften i det. Men måske jeg fanger ideen med layoutet, når jeg har kigget på det gennem længere tid. Man kan jo vænne sig til meget.

eb2

Jeg kan heller ikke lige se nogle fornyelser, som gør sitet mere brugervenligt (udover de nye faneblade i toppen), men det kan jo være de kommer…

Men for mig lige nu – så er det altså en øjebæ…

Her er et udsnit af hvad folk på Twitter siger lige nu om sitet.
eb3

(følg selv udviklingen på Twitter her)

Hvad siger du?

Reklamer

Cybersquatting at Twitter

Well – Cybersquatting is well known when we talk about traditional web pages. But now it’s also becoming a problem at Twitter.

I got a tip about this phenomenon from Lars K. Jensen (a Danish journalist from EkstraBladet). He wrote on Jaiku that he just had discovered that the name of the newspaper EkstraBladet already was taken at Twitter. He also tried some other Danish newspaper and the result was that almost all Twitter-names of the large papers had been taken.

Newspaper like Politiken, Berlingske Tidende, Nyhedsavisen, Børsen and 24 Timer have all had their names taken at Twitter.

Just look here

www.twitter.com/ekstrabladet
www.twitter.com/politiken
www.twitter.com/berlingske
www.twitter.com/nyhedsavisen
www.twitter.com/borsen
www.twitter.com/24timer

All names was taken on March 30, 2007. And all by the same person – even though there are using different names. All have the same contact email written in the first and only tweet.

The Danish newpapers are not the only one. Netflix is also suffering from cybersquatting. This is an even more obvious case. The one who set up the Twitter account – www.twitter.com/netflix – has put on a web address saying “for sale contact…”. I saw this at Simple Pixel.

Lars K. Jensen contacted the person behind who stole the Twitter-name of his newspaper – and got this reply

I would be happy to release the username over to you – However I believe that we should conduct a transaction – showing good faith on both parts.

A documentet donation to a charity organization – such as eg. Red Cross for no less than 50$ will be a prudent environment for us to make such a transaction.

I have a lot of respect for organizations like Red Cross – but why are they mixed into this?? Why not just give the Twitter-name back – it don’t belong to them. On top of this Cybersquatting is also against Twitter’s TOS (terms of service)

6. We reserve the right to reclaim usernames on behalf of businesses or individuals that hold legal claim or trademark on those usernames.

With this story in mind – I can only encourage companies and others to claim their own Twitter name ASAP (I have just done so this evening for my own company Rescu Kommunikation🙂 and my private Twitter account has been active for some time – so no problem there 🙂)